The NHRCK have made their decision (and ATEK are not operating illegally)
I have it from a reliable source that the NHRCK have made a decision in regard to the Equal Checks for All campaign, and so I figure this is a good time for me to break my silence in regard to ATEK.
The HIV tests are not something that the NHRCK want to even get into. I suspect that they are not sure if they can call ‘not wanting to foot the bill for a foreigners medical care’ as a human rights infringement.
As for the background checks. They have found that all teachers in Korea, be they Korean nationals or those on other visa types, are required to submit a background check from their country of permanent residence (i.e. Korea), and so foreigners should have to undergo the same checks.
6 months of headache for this. Nice!
In other news, I recently heard the outcome of the Prosecutors investigation into ATEK’s fundraising. It went to my old address instead of my email address as requested, and so it got to me via the new occupant calling my wife, getting my permission to open it, and then reading it to my wife over the phone.
Unless ATEK raise funds, they are 100% legal in Korea. This goes not only for the organisation, but also for the volunteer members who work for free regardless of their Visa type. If the volunteer members draw a salary or expenses, then things get hairy.
ATEK can also engage in fundraising activities, as long as the funds are used for charitable purposes. This means that they can not be used to pay for things to give away (such as books), can not be used to pay expenses for seminars or press conferences, and can not be used to pay for travel around the country. They CAN be used to assist teachers who are suffering hardship.
The amount they may raise is capped at 10 million won before they need to register. It was not made clear if this is a total, or an amount per fiscal year, but they don’t need to be worrying until they come close to that limit either way.
If they wanted to be smart about this, could could start off with a simple fund, and when a teacher is in need, they can have that teacher raise their own funds with ATEK members donating. That teacher can then repay ATEK. Sure, it relies on the teacher being trustworthy, but it does allow ATEK to keep raising funds without capping. They raise the funds, they loan the cash to the teacher, and the teacher repays it with funds they have raised. Happy days!
Now that they are (a) legal, and (b) unlikely to fuck around with ECFA campaigns again, I just might join them
